Skip to content

What Is the Difference Between Investment Banks and Traditional Banks?

Many people confuse investment banks with traditional banks because both are part of the financial industry. Some even belong to the same financial groups. But their roles, clients, and business models are completely different. This article explains those differences clearly, and why it matters to understand them.


Two Different Roles in the Financial System

Both types of banks exist to move money from those who have it to those who need it. But they do it in very different ways.

Traditional banks, also called commercial banks, serve the financial needs of the general public. They offer checking and savings accounts, personal loans, mortgages, and small business financing. These banks use their own balance sheet—meaning they take deposits from customers and lend that money to borrowers. They earn money by charging more interest on loans than they pay on deposits.

Investment banks, on the other hand, work with large companies, governments, and institutional investors. They help these clients raise capital by selling stocks or bonds, advise on mergers and acquisitions, and connect them with global investors. Investment banks don’t use their own money to fund these deals. Instead, they structure transactions and bring together investors and companies. They earn fees for their advice, deal execution, and market access.


Who They Serve

Traditional banks serve everyday people and small businesses. Their customers include individuals applying for home loans, entrepreneurs opening business accounts, and families saving for the future.

Investment banks serve a completely different group of clients. Their customers are large corporations looking to raise billions, governments issuing sovereign bonds, pension funds investing in infrastructure, and private equity firms buying or selling businesses. These clients need complex financial services that go far beyond what a regular bank can offer.


What Services They Provide

Traditional banks offer familiar services like deposit accounts, credit cards, personal loans, and mortgages. Their services are designed to meet everyday financial needs.

Investment banks provide services that involve much larger amounts of money and more complex deals. They help companies go public through IPOs, advise on billion-dollar mergers, underwrite bond sales for governments, and manage cross-border financial transactions. While traditional banks move money on a personal level, investment banks move capital on a national and global scale.


How They Make Money

Traditional banks make money mostly from interest income. They pay customers a small amount of interest on deposits, then lend that money at higher rates to borrowers. They also earn fees from services like ATM use, account maintenance, and foreign currency exchange.

Investment banks make money in very different ways. They charge advisory fees when they help clients with mergers or corporate strategy. They earn underwriting fees when they manage IPOs or bond sales. They also make money from trading, asset management fees, and investment gains when they invest their own money alongside clients. Their earnings depend on the size and success of the deals they complete, not on interest spreads.


How They Are Regulated

Traditional banks are heavily regulated to protect depositors. In the U.S., for example, the FDIC insures customer deposits up to a certain limit. These banks follow strict rules to limit risky investments and protect customer savings.

Investment banks don’t take deposits from the public. Their clients are large financial players who understand and accept financial risk. Because of this, investment banks have historically faced fewer restrictions. This changed after the 2008 financial crisis, when risky behavior by some investment banks contributed to a global financial meltdown. New rules like the Dodd-Frank Act increased oversight, but investment banks still operate with more flexibility than traditional banks.


How They Became Part of the Same Financial Groups

For much of the 20th century, investment banks and traditional banks were completely separate. This separation was enforced by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, passed after the 1929 stock market crash. It was designed to protect consumer deposits from being used in risky investment activities.

This separation lasted until 1999, when the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed key parts of Glass-Steagall. This allowed banks to merge their commercial and investment banking services. Big financial groups like J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup were born, offering everything from checking accounts to billion-dollar M&A advisory.

While this model allowed banks to offer more services under one roof, it also introduced new risks. Many of these universal banks took on too much risk, contributing to the 2008 financial crisis. Some collapsed, while others were bailed out by governments. Although new rules were introduced after the crisis, the full separation between traditional and investment banking was never restored.


Pure Investment Banks vs. Universal Banks

Today, some firms still operate as pure investment banks. These include companies like Lazard, Evercore, and Rothschild. They focus only on advisory work, capital raising, and financial strategy. They don’t offer retail banking services or take customer deposits.

Other firms, known as universal banks, combine both commercial and investment banking under one umbrella. These include J.P. Morgan, Citi, and Barclays. They serve retail customers, corporations, and governments, offering a full range of financial services. This model gives them more business opportunities, but it also makes them larger and more complex to manage.


Bottom Line

While both traditional and investment banks operate in the financial system, they serve very different clients, offer very different services, and make money in very different ways. One helps individuals and small businesses with everyday financial needs. The other helps large organizations manage complex financial deals on a global scale.

Understanding this difference helps explain why both types of banks exist, how they shape the economy, and what makes their business models unique. Whether you’re looking to open a bank account or follow the next big IPO, knowing the role of each type of bank helps you see the bigger picture.

Latest